Coverage Contract Integrity
Who determines which evidence should have existed? v0.2 governs coverage but does not fully govern the integrity of the coverage contract itself.
Related material →Open Problems
What still bothers me.
These questions remain unresolved and could materially change the architecture. A proposed response is not a resolution; each question stays open until evidence and a decision support a status change.
Evidence Independence Integrity
How should corroboration behave when lineage cannot be independently established? Should unknown independence be prevented from increasing corroboration?
Related material →Emergency Trigger Independence
Who determines that conditions justifying extraordinary authority actually exist, especially if the beneficiary component could manufacture or modify the trigger?
Related material →Human Decision Integrity
How should consequential human divergence be governed without inferring motive?
Related material →Atomic Closure
Can every governed operational reasoning problem be decomposed into the current twelve?
Related material →v1.0 Stability
When has the architecture stopped changing at the foundational level? The working criterion is architectural stability, not the end of new attacks.
Related material →Nothing disappears after resolution.
When an issue is resolved, I will retain the original finding, link the change and validation record, and show what uncertainty remains.